CROSSING at Signature Theatre: The Reaction

Everyone steps into the theatre coming from a different background and with a different set of life views and opinions. This is similar to the essence of Crossing, a new musical that was presented by Signature Theatre in Arlington, VA, written by Matt Conner and Grace Barnes. The musical, inspired by the story of Harriet Tubman and the search for freedom, according to composer Matt Conner, is the story of eight different people from different time periods and walks of life, all existing at the same train station on their search for something more in their lives.

After being asked by Signature to pen a new musical, Conner said that he and Barnes "we picked the topic of sort of a human search for freedom, and we went all over the world: every civilization, character, and we found other types of freedoms...[and it] became a larger conversation about what freedom was."

After a developmental period at Signature and at the Shenandoah Conservatory, when Crossing returned to Signature, the show received mixed reviews from critics and audiences alike.

In Nelson Pressley's review for The Washington Post, he says that "On this enchanted platform, these archetypal figures talk together across the years, though Barnes and Conner don’t give them much to say. “Crossing” is less interested in history than in character sketches; big historical moments are simply the backdrop for personal crises." This makes it clear that although Conner and Barnes had a clear vision of what they wanted Crossing to say, it did not always read that way to the audience.

While critics unanimously enjoyed Conner's music, many felt the book needed to clarify the true arc of the characters and what they gain throughout the show. Charles Shubow, who reviewed the show for BroadwayWorld.com, noted how the book needed to better link the eight stories together.

Audience members had similar issues as the reviewers and didn't truly understand the message that Conner & Barnes were trying to get across. In a comment on the Washington Post review, user "smpflueger" said that "Undercooked is the perfect word. While performed well, the material is the problem...Ultimately the [characters] don't seem to have a lot to say and I didn't care about them. They are mere scetches [sic] of people, architypes [sic] without much fleshing out."

Conner has spoked to a lot of audience members after the show and while "some people felt it was unfinished, people were trying to figure out “what this is” because people want to put it in its box, but I can’t put it in a box." This stresses an interesting idea of what a piece of theatre needs to be and if the writers need to put a label on their work.

While the show started as a search for freedom, in Conner's eyes "this play is about the connections we all have as human and how those connections make us who we are."

Like the eight characters in the show, everyone has different views and is affected by life differently. So too audiences reacted very differently to this new musical and took away different messages of what it meant to be free.

Preview: CROSSING at Signature Theatre

Signature Theatre in Arlington, VA is currently presenting it's second musical of its season, a world-premiere, CROSSING. CROSSING features a book by Grace Barnes, a playwright out of NYC, and Matt Conner, a local who frequently works and collaborates with Signature.

According to the synopsis on their website, "Crossing explores the interwoven stories of eight people from different decades of the past century who come together at a train station. Some are waiting for the train, others are waiting for visitors, a few are just…waiting. All of them are searching – for hopes and dreams, for new beginnings, for answers. As their stories are brought to musical life in the train station, the characters discover that, while every life is different, the journey is always the same. With music ranging from gospel to pop to rock, Crossing unites the musical eras through the souls who lived them."

This original idea seems evocative of the themes currently invading new musical theatre, which tend towards darker, pop-rock driven scores and stories to evoke stronger reactions out of audiences. 

Although in its world premiere production, CROSSING was workshopped at Signature, so it will be interesting to see how far in its developmental process it is. Will it be rough around the edges, or give a clear, strong narrative?

DC is becoming more well-known for being an incubator city for new musicals, but it is still a theatrical form that is not extremely common in town. It will be interesting to see the audience reaction in a town used to seeing tried and true classics (like Miss Saigon and Gypsy, which book-ended CROSSING in Signature's season).

CROSSING seems to be exploring the issue of whether or not the journey or the destination is what matters most. It will be interesting to see how true this is. I'll know soon enough.

Welcome!

Welcome to my blog, My Theatre Review. I'd like to introduce myself to all readers before I get started with the blog.

My name is Max and I am a senior at The George Washington University in Washington, DC and am studying Journalism and Theatre. This blog is going to serve as the centerpiece of an independent study I am conducting this semester on the relationship between theatre and classic theatre criticism and social media.

As a dual Journalism and Theatre major, my interests very much straddle both disciplines not only uniquely, but also how they interact with each other. So much of our School of Media and Public Affairs study at GW is focused in politics, so I want to explore a different side of the media. The media and theatre have a very interesting relationship because the media directly affects audience reaction and also spreads audience reactions.

For my project, I didn’t just want to explore theatre criticism (the most obvious combination of journalism and theatre). So I thought how the media really affects theatre and it does so in two major ways: criticism and social media. Both of these things not only promote a show and make a show more well known, they also can change how people view the piece of theatre and the effect it has on society and audiences.

What is interesting about this project will be tracking how much the combination of audience reactions and critical reviews changes the effectiveness of any political or cultural messages that the plays try to convey to audiences. It will be interesting to observe how this varies between the shows because their genres and subjects are so different.

This idea of intended versus unintended meaning intrigues me and I am also very interested in new plays and theatrical development, so for my independent study I will go to see three new plays around DC, observe audience reaction (through talking to people, Twitter/Facebook, and reviews), and then talk to a playmaker, either playwright or director, and see whether the actual message that the audiences took away was similar to their intended message.

The three plays I will be seeing is The Argument by Alexandra Gersten-Vassilaros at Theatre J, a lab production of Red Speedo by Lucas Hnath at Studio Theatre, and Crossing, a world premiere musical, at Signature Theatre. These are three very different pieces of theatre and therefore will allow for very different experiences, both for me as a scholar and for audiences and their reactions.

I am really excited for this project and would love any responses, comments, or feedback you can give me!

-Max